Warren Bell used to be known as Anthony Bruce
You can read the backstory here;
Lauren Brattle is pictured with him in that news story and several others.
I guess if you took that story at face value then Bruce would be entirely the bad guy and his g/f just a meek and mild victim in all of it.
Lauren Brattle claims she changed her named to Laura Terrie Bell to “put Anthony Bruce totally behind her”.
Cool. The problem is that all of our sources were reporting back that the pair never truly separated at all and it was in trying to trace ‘Warren’ that we were led to what is apparently her address officially.
If it seems odd that someone who wanted to put Bruce behind her would just so happen to reinvent herself using the self same surname as he now uses, then its even more odd that our watertight sources that are never wrong should so happen to lead us to her, while seeking him.
What are the odds that they both happened to change their names to precisely the same thing and what are the odds that our search for his new locale should lead us right to her…
However, I am sure that we and our entire network of sources are totally wrong and that Miss Bell/Brattle is the ‘innocent victim’ in ….. well … everything she ever does.
She already admitted to us in one PM that she is “totally unstable”. She blames everyone else for this though. Its my fault, it was Browns fault, it was the fault of everyone in her past ever.
If Brattle wants to insist that her “ex” isn’t with her – so be it. Lets just say its probably not in her financial interests to say otherwise.
We’ll just assume that it was a random coincidence that they both so happened to take the surname, we’ll assume that all sources are randomly wrong at the same time, and we’ll assume that Miss Brattle/Bell/Whatever Because She Uses Many – is a poor and innocent victim.
In actual fact, I’d pretty much say she could be in the running for Person of the Year.
Keep in mind that this girl would have the World believe she is the perpetual victim in everything and never does wrong. How about this little insight? What you’re reading there are screeshots sent by Miss Brattle/Bell to a women and her children today.
Does she still seem like an innocent victim to you?
She willingly told us that her child(ren) are not with her as she is not deemed fit to look after her/him/them.
Its probably not an amazing surprise if her choice of partner is the sterling Anthony Brown. But no doubt that will be someone elses fault as well.
A women has to be pretty unhinged in order for their child not to live with them. Absolutely everything is normally done to keep mum and child under one roof, esp if there is no father around either.
But you only need have eyes in your head to read the sort of filth and sickness that easily flows from her and aimed at a women’s children no less.
We gave her every chance and freedom to denounce what she had written to the women, but she refused to do so.
Just read the words. Those aren’t the words of a normal person. I’ve never written that way to anyone ever – not even to the filth we deal with.
Let alone a women’s child.
The detail and depth is really pretty disturbing as well.
She has at least two dogs. Since she decided to make an appearance to claim that she and Warren Bell are not together etc, and since she willingly told us she doesn’t have her child as she’s not deemed stable enough, we did ask if she considers herself stable enough to own the dogs that she now has.
Dogs can be a big pressure just like children. If she is fit to look after one then why not both? If she’s deemed unfit to care for her own child, its bizarre how anyone could consider her fit to then have dogs.
Her answer to this? Her dogs are “specially trained to deal with people that have borderline personality disorder”.
I’m probably going to have to re-read that one if ever I take LSD.
Its quite remarkable that we apparently have dogs that are trained in dealing with nuanced psychological issues like Borderline Personality Disorder. Keep in mind that this particular ‘disorder’ frequently splits psychiatry.
But dogs have it nailed. She might have picked a boyfriend who put her last dog in scalding hot water (the story goes). She might send outright threats aimed at children. But its okay, because she now has two dogs who are trained in dealing with people with her issue, such as it is.
You can see why her word doesn’t exactly seem what you’d call rock solid, huh?
But hey, I’m sure that she’s telling the truth and that she just hasn’t even set eyes on Bruce/Bell since the day he got out. Perish the thought. It must be a remarkable and astonishing coincidence that the path to him led right to her. Remarkable.
It must also be just one of those amazing things that they both so happened to change their surnames to Bell.
What’s not to believe when you think about it? Everything she says and does seems so watertight and sound. There’s nothing in these messages to this lady and her children that remotely suggest that she could possibly be a bad person.
She sounds ace.
No sign there that she has some sort of psychotic temper issue herself or anything.
Jeez, I even had to say to this girl that when she writes stuff like that, as detailed and as indefensible as that to a women’s children, that people are going to ask themselves just who really did brutally attack that dog.
Officially – him. Granted.
But when you look at the detail and savagery of those posts by her… well of course it would make anyone wonder.
Incidentally, we didn’t contact this girl or her *coughs* ex. She contacted us.
She paints herself as vulnerable and meek while making terrible threats like that to a women and her children.
I told her tonight that she needs to quit hiding behind her supposed mental illness.
I see that far too often and its a sleight on those who’ve had issues.
Anyway. Lets play along with it then.
Lets assume that its a stunning coincidence they both changed their name to the same thing, lets assume its a remarkable coincidence that our lead for him led straight to her, and lets say that she sounds exactly and precisely like a solid and honest person.
And lets pretend that these threats made to a women’s child just didn’t happen. Or something.
Despite what this professional victim may claim we issued zero threats to her at all. Not ever. Never even had contact with her until today.
Her idea of ‘bullying’ is this. We got information that she is allegedly involved in fraud. We informed her we’d report that to the authorities to look into. That’s ‘bullying’ in her minds eye. I call it acting upon information received, and hey, if she is totally innocent (yet again), then what’s the issue? Truth will out, huh?
The irony is that we weren’t even going to do that until we got sight of those screenshots. Its not like it was a huge priority to us right now, until she went off the deep end and began her sick threats aimed at someone’s children.
But okay Lauren Brattle/Bell. Lets just all assume that you are totally telling the truth and that its just a series of incredible coincidences that somehow led us right to you.
I hope for the sake of your dogs that, against the odds, you are telling the truth. I hope for their sake that (again against all odds) you manage to see your way to maybe not bringing assorted sickos and psychopaths into your life.
You? You can do what the hell you want so long as its only impacting upon you. We only ‘care’ about this supposed ex of yours being around you because you do have dogs and other pets. Were it not for that then you and he could bounce around together on insanity beach all day long.
But you INSIST that’s not so. I personally do not believe a word you say, but lets hope I am wrong then.
Lets hope that we are totally wrong and somehow this is a massive coincidence and that you are neither seeing him nor committing fraud.
Time will tell.