Andrew Frankish is a psychopath. While not all psychopaths are violently dangerous – he is. The psychopath is a pathological liar. It comes naturally to them and they are able to lie even when caught red handed. We need only recall the chat logs in January of this year. Despite being shown the footage that he and his brother created, Andrew Frankish was still able to twist and turn and suggest that while he was “99% certain it was him”(in the video) that it could not be him as he “would never be cruel to any animal”. Displaying the typical triumphant nature of someone from the Dark Triad pathology, he was simply toying with the mind of the other person in that chat log. He would have found it amusing to confuse the other person with his blatantly lies and contrary statements.
This is the mind behind the person;
“The dark triad is a subject in psychology that focuses on three personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy.
All three dark triad traits are conceptually distinct although empirical evidence shows them to be overlapping. They are associated with a callous-manipulative interpersonal style.
Narcissism is characterised by grandiosity, pride, egotism, and a lack of empathy.
Machiavellianism is characterized by manipulation and exploitation of others, a cynical disregard for morality, and a focus on self-interest and deception.
Psychopathy is characterized by enduring antisocial behavior, impulsivity, selfishness, callousness, and remorselessness.
Several researchers have suggested expanding the dark triad to contain a fourth dark trait. Everyday sadism, defined as the enjoyment of cruelty, is the most common addition. While sadism is highly correlated with the dark triad, researchers have shown that sadism predicts anti-social behavior beyond the dark triad..”
As you can see that fits the profile of Andrew Frankish perfectly. Owing to the fact that he is inherently twisted it follows that his relations with all and anything will always have a twisted component. This will very much include his choice of “humour”.
It is very common for these types of people to state their intentions and wrap it up under the guise of a “joke”. They are showing you a fragment of how their mind works but will do so in such a way as to appear they aren’t being serious.
They do this so that if anyone objects to what is said they can try to flip it around and say they were only kidding around.
They very often do it on a personal level, they will perhaps say things to another person that are designed to humiliate them. If that person objects then a person like Frankish will retreat back to saying he was only fooling around.
With that being said I do not know anyone that thinks that raping children and defecating on them is funny. I know no one at all that would ever think to make light of such a thing let alone do so on social media. I would be deeply troubled if I did know anyone that found such things funny or who even had such thoughts to start with.
I suggest you should be extremely alarmed by such humour(sic) when it comes from the same person that laughed with joy as he threw his defencelss dog down the stairs and turned her into a trampoline.
I would strongly suggest that when t comes to the “humour” of Andrew Frankish that you take it very seriously and literally.
The warning signs are all there. Isn’t it obvious that this is one very twisted and dangerous person? If you are a parent, ask yourself if you think its fair and reasonable that him and his brother are free to be near your pets and children.
Do you find THIS funny and to be dismissed? Or do you consider it a massive red flag?