I wonder how many people have said this in all of time – “There’s no way (insert subject) will ever happen”. Only for the very thing they said would never happen to happen.
I could give several examples right now, things that even 30 years ago would have been seen as a total social “no way”. Rarely are these “no way” changes for the good and almost always they damage the very fabric of the nation and a people. I am at times utterly astonished to see what walks under that generic banner of “progressive”. It often doesn’t seem like progress to me, in fact it often seems like flat out deviant behaviour dressed up as some sort of social progress.
Sadly there aren’t many social taboos left anymore. That’s why our society is in the gutter right now. That’s why everyone from establishment figures like Greville Janner to member of the public like Andrew Frankish are raping kids or torturing animals for fun. We have totally and completely lost our way. The only people with an excuse are minors since they are too young to do anything about it, they only inherit our failings.
Just as there is an undercurrent of dangerous deviants masquerading under this progressive banner so too are there publications which aim to prime you to accepting their deviant actions.
Salon.com is such a magazine.
I believe its readership is mostly American but they have quite a large readership – relatively speaking. Here’s the methodology of a publication such as that. Take an abhorrent behaviour that any healthy society rightly rejects and is repulsed by. Then gradually try to normalise it.
The following is a perfect example of this process. As you will clearly see, Salon gives a platform to a degenerate paedophile. Their intention? To get the reader to foolishly feel sorry for the individual. If you can provoke a sense of pity among people then they will eventually be manipulated into “feeling bad” about hating on such individuals. It then becomes “progressive” to tolerate and embrace them. Left unchallenged and unchecked this eventually grows stronger and better organised until one day the goal of legalising paedophilia is reached. But there’s “no way that would ever happen”, right?
I’m a pedophile, but not a monster
I’m attracted to children but unwilling to act on it. Before judging me harshly, would you be willing to listen?
I was born without my right hand. As a child, this deformity quickly set me apart from my peers. In public I wore a prosthesis, an intimidating object to other youngsters because of its resemblance to a pirates hook. Even so, I wore it every day; I felt inadequate without it. I was shy, uncoordinated and terrible at sports, all of which put me on the outs with other boys my age. But I was good at drawing and making up stories for my own entertainment, and I spent more and more time in my own head, being a space adventurer or monster wrangler or whatever character I could think up. These would ultimately prove to be useful skills, but for now they only served to further alienate me from other kids.
On top of it all, I still struggled with bladder control likely due to my heaping pile of insecurities, to which this problem only added morewell into my elementary school years.
But none of this would compare to the final insult the universe would deal me. I’ve been stuck with the most unfortunate of sexual orientations, a preference for a group of people who are legally, morally and psychologically unable to reciprocate my feelings and desires. It’s a curse of the first order, a completely unworkable sexuality, and it’s mine. Who am I? Nice to meet you. My name is Todd Nickerson, and I’m a pedophile. Does that surprise you? Yeah, not many of us are willing to share our story, for good reason. To confess a sexual attraction to children is to lay claim to the most reviled status on the planet, one that effectively ends any chance you have of living a normal life.”
I’ve only included a section of it but the link is there for anyone who cares to read it all. Note how Todd Nickerson (“nick your son”) begins off by arrogantly seeking credit. He is attracted to kids but “unwilling to act on it”. He seeks plaudits here. But this is also probably his first lie. Paedophiles are by their very nature pathological liars.
Then we’re treated to some frankly irrelevant rubbish about his bladder control and a bad right hand. I guess that’s also there to draw you in, get you forming a connection with him and feeling sorry for him.
Then, like a bolt from the blue, Todd was “suddenly struck with an unfortunate sexual orientation”. This is the language that an abuser uses to soften their actions. Makes it sound like getting measles. What Todd really means is he wanted to rape kids. Note how the self-pitying Todd blames “the universe” and how it has treated him oh so very badly. Note how these types always blame anyone or anything else and in this case it’s the universe and his bladder. Just as the brothers would probably have a trillion excuses for their perversions.
There’s only one thing to do when anyone begins to speak that way and that is to cut them short and turn your back on them from the get go. Never listen to “their story” because a story is precisely what you will get. These people are highly manipulative and if given an open invite they will gradually manipulate you. If something sounds and feels unnatural to you then it probably is. Do not entertain it. There are no “good paedophiles”. There are no “good animal perverts”. The only difference between all of them are their levels of intelligence. The low-functioning types like the brothers tend to lose their own evidence and hang themselves. People like ‘Todd’ are more intelligent in their strategy. They slowly try to win you over to their side by trying to establish a bond with you. Once they have your ear you may then listen to why they want to rape kids.
Go forward 20 years and if those types of tactics are not seen and stamped on right now then all the paedos in the British and US establishment will get their way and there won’t be an age of consent. They realise this will be a hard one to get over the line and could take a generation of gradual propaganda. But they will try. And they will put a lot of time and money into it. “But bro, there’s just no way people would accept it, they’d be up in arms” you say. Yes, if it were done suddenly and abruptly without planning. But through the methods of gradualism and slowly getting you to see predators in a “new light”, then over time conditions are created in which the age of consent can be driven down and down until it would be argued that there’s no use having one at all.
Be very aware and on your guard against those sorts of tactics as they are more dangerous than any single paeophile could ever be. And never feel so cosy and complacent as to think there aren’t those with the resources and dedication to make it a reality. Which leads me nicely onto a not unrelated subject and one just as off-the-scale vile. I speak here of what is called ‘zoophilia’ and also ‘bestiality’. This is the sort of thing I just never would have imagined existed until I was told otherwise.
“Zoophilia is a paraphilia involving a sexual fixation on non-human animals. Bestiality is cross-species sexual activity between human and non-human animals. The terms are often used interchangeably, but some researchers make a distinction between the attraction (zoophilia) and the act (bestiality)” (Wiki)
And just as you might expect these utter weirdo’s then invent what I suppose they believe to be an “intellectual argument”.
(Wiki again below)
Some defenders of bestiality argue that the issue of sexual consent is irrelevant because many legal human practices (such as semen collection, artificial insemination, hunting, laboratory testing, and slaughtering animals for meat) do not involve the consent of the animal. Brian Cutteridge states the following regarding this argument:
“Animal sexual autonomy is regularly violated for human financial gain through procedures such as [artificial insemination and slaughter]. Such procedures are probably more disturbing physically and psychologically than acts of zoophilia would be, yet the issue of consent on the part of the animal is never raised in the discussion of such procedures. To confine the ‘right’ of any animal strictly to acts of zoophilia is thus to make a law [against zoophilia] based not on reason but on moral prejudice, and to breach the constitutional rights of zoophiles to due process and equality before the law. […] Laws which criminalize zoophilia based on societal abhorrence of such acts rather than any real harm caused by such acts are an unjust and unconstitutional infringement on individual liberty.”
So there we have it. Not being able to fuck the dog is “unjust and and an infringement on individual liberty”. But it gets worse still so don’t loosen your collars just yet;
This from 2013.
“Bestiality brothels are spreading through Germany faster than ever thanks to a law that makes animal porn illegal but sex with animals legal, a livestock protection officer has warned.
Madeleine Martin told the Frankfurter Rundschau that current laws were not protecting animals from predatory zoophiles who are increasingly able to turn to bestiality as a ‘lifestyle choice’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2352779/Bestiality-brothels-spreading-Germany-campaigner-claims-abusers-sex-animals-lifestyle-choice.html#ixzz4Bmv28jqe
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
See that theme again? A “lifestyle choice”.
Sophistry at its very worse.
On the upside Denmark apparently got around to banning such things.
This from 2015;
“Denmark has become one of the last European countries to ban bestiality.
Until the new law was passed on Tuesday, sex with animals was still legal in the country as long as the animal was unharmed.
Activists claimed the strange law was difficult to prove, and was making Denmark a hotspot for animal sex tourists.
Hungary, Finland and Romania are now the only EU countries where bestiality, or zoophilia, is legal.”
It is totally amazing to me that a country like Denmark would even NEED such a law, but since they clearly did it is then amazing to me that it took as long as it did. I note that there are still three nations mentioned where it is legal. I can barely even believe it. It’s like something from the Daily Onion.
This is what happens when you have a race to the bottom as a society; this is what happens when you tear down all boundaries and social taboos. This is what happens when you are brainwashed into “not judging” and “being tolerant of people whatever they are”. Well you were lied to.
You should judge and you should not extend your tolerance to something that is patently perverse. When you have a society with all social norms turned upside down and all taboos broken down, then what do you expect but what you see today? You don’t end up with some liberal paradise of freedom in which we all hold hands and sing “I’d Like to Teach The World To Sing”. You end up with a society of utter filth in which all that you love will be tainted and all that you feared will come true. Why? Because there are extremely powerful and extremely perverted people in high places, in politics, media, law. And they connect with one another. They use their combined skills and power to gradually but relentlessly poison your society so that it becomes one large toilet bowl of filth – just like their own minds. Their heaven will be your hell.
The proliferation of these things isn’t happening all by itself. It’s being pushed and driven. It’s deliberate and calculated.
Dismiss this at your own cost and that of the future for your children and the nation they grow up in.