So the really exciting race to be next Tory leader and therefore PM is at an end. Emerging from the initial five or six really mediocre candidates of questionable character is May.
For me it makes almost no difference who the PM is or even which of the two establishment parties happen to be in office. What does make the difference is you – the people.
If you are a society who do not keep an eye on your leaders, who they are and what they are, then do not be surprised when they ignore you further down the line.
Do not be surprised if they are self serving if you aren’t calling them out and at every damn opportunity. And don’t expect a safe and balanced society for your descendants if you are neglecting it and not doing your all that you can to MAKE that a reality.
What happens to almost anything when its neglected? It goes bad, it decays and it rots. Why then would you ever think it is any different for a society or community?
This is what happens when you spend an entire generation chasing only hedonism, putting talentless c- listers on a pedestal and living your life in some selfish and atmoised way – everything goes to shit.
This is what happens when you place no pride in anything, be that a pride in a set of moral absolutes or even a national pride. Instead of moral absolutes we have this ‘moral relativism’ pushed into our culture which is really just a complex way of getting you to think that what you see as bad can be good and what you know to be evil may not be evil after all.
It will be on the back end of this twisted ideology that the perverts and the scum who have the ear of the establishment will try and try to legalise paedophilia. I know what you’re thinking, there is just no way they would get that one over the line. Really?
These things never happen overnight or in a vacuum and there have been attempts made before to co-opt Governments and politicians into it.
Indeed, one might very well ask why this women appears to have the ear of our new PM;
Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, called on Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to relax rules which automatically ban sex offenders from caring for children, saying that this could breach their human rights.
In her article, Miss Reece suggested that the review should also introduce an assumption that sex offenders including child abusers posed no threat once they had served their sentence.
She said: “There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them.”
She has also argued that rape victims should no longer be granted anonymity.
At least the Home Office kicked this idea into touch..
A Home Office spokesman said: “It is safe to say that the vetting review will not be considering allowing paedophiles to adopt. It wouldn’t exactly go down well with the public. ”
Why does a creature like Reece even get any space given to her in national newspapers, let alone in the context of who is now our PM? If it were up to me I wouldn’t be so much giving her a soapbox, I’d be seriously questioning her own vested interest in this and I’d be looking into her associates and activities. It is deeply ironic that that Reece has an MSc in logic and scientific method. Logic? Really? Once again..
“There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them. “ (Reece)
Establishment figures sure lend their ear to the most suspect of people. I have down the years watched a variety of politicians, TV networks and other media give credibility and a platform to a man that made this statement. Here it is word for word. You read it and draw your own conclusions.
“ The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy. While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful…”
The author of that? So called British ‘human rights’ campaigner, Peter Tatchell. A letter he wrote to the Guardian in 1997. He later tried to back peddle.
Yet any time the media want a sound bite about ‘human rights’ they will offer this individual a legitimate platform.
Indeed, in this Guardian article from 2006 they beg the question..
Is Peter Tatchell a national treasure?
Based on how his mind clearly works and his twisted ‘morality’ my simple answer would be ‘no’.
You can see how rotting and decayed things are when someone with an MSc in logic concludes that “There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them. “
You can further see how far that rot goes when a man who said “it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful” is held up by the press as a ‘national treasure’.
They will be giving the OBE to a serial child rapist next. Oh .. hang on.
Is it therefore any wonder that within such a society that you would have a professional body like the RCVS stating that “vets dont need to report suspected crimes but they can if they wish”? Wow. Just wow. What next? A child carer doesn’t need to report suspected child abuse? A member of the public can just leave someone they see dying in the street? A hit and run driver is only obligated to report the incident if his paintwork is scratched?
Do you want a nation where this…
Is ‘punished’ with this..?
Or even this..?
Do you want a nation where this triggers more reaction from authorities …
Of course you don’t. But how MUCH don’t you want it? OF can win this particular battle, only by virtue of our collective efforts did we make at least this one lenient sentence somewhat less lenient than they could have ever dreamed possible.
Its not been your council, your state, your police chiefs or even your media that have kept the public alert and informed and its not them who at least give innocents a chance of being safe. They do not care about you. Only OF and our trusted allies have done what they should all be doing.
We don’t want to accept this inverted and degenerate society one day longer, thats why we have (and will) give our everything. Thats how sick we are of it. And now more people need to quit saying how enraged and sick they are at ALL of this and turn that energy into something constructive if they are not already doing so.
Over the past three months we have laid out a template for victory, not merely victory over them but a victory over a system and culture that rewards them and lets victims down.
As simple as it sounds all a large enough % of British people need to do is simply follow it, like I have said many times, threaten the state with violence and you will get violence back. Threaten the state by cutting off their funds and you will eventually have them grovelling at your feet.
We have 1,000 people signed up to our “or else” petition. We want 50,000 and if ever one was WORTH putting your name to it is this one. I’m not entirely sure why 800,000 people allegedly signed one that had NO teeth and we have one that has a winning strategy built into it and it has 1,000. But it is what it is, all we can do is build it and promote it and assure you that you WILL create shock waves if it caught fire.